This report delves into the persistent issues faced by car dealerships when custom ordering vehicles from General Motors, specifically highlighting the challenges with Chevrolet and Cadillac models. A dealership insider revealed how popular features are often unavailable through the online ordering system, leading to significant delays and customer dissatisfaction. This situation underscores a broader problem within GM's manufacturing and allocation processes, affecting both the efficiency of dealerships and the expectations of prospective car owners.
The extended wait times for custom-ordered GM vehicles, which can stretch into many months or even years, are a source of considerable frustration for both dealerships and consumers. Dealership personnel, who navigate these complex ordering systems, frequently encounter limitations that prevent them from securing desirable configurations. This bottleneck not only impacts sales but also damages customer relationships, as buyers are left waiting indefinitely for vehicles that may never arrive in their desired specifications. The underlying systemic issues within GM's production and distribution channels appear to be at the root of these widespread complaints, affecting the brand's reputation and customer loyalty.
The ordering process for new Chevrolet and Cadillac vehicles presents notable hurdles, particularly when specific feature packages are desired. A car buyer representing a family dealership recently shed light on these frustrations, detailing how the online system frequently limits access to highly demanded options, such as advanced safety and technology suites for models like the 2026 Chevrolet Equinox. This restriction means that even the most popular and appealing configurations are often listed with no available quantity, creating a challenging scenario for dealerships trying to meet customer demands.
The online GM Order Workbench, intended to streamline vehicle customization and acquisition, paradoxically becomes a source of aggravation. Dealership staff, when attempting to specify popular features or packages, encounter a system that displays “constraints,” indicating that these options are simply not buildable for the current production cycle. This is particularly problematic for configurations that are widely sought after, compelling dealerships to explain to customers why their preferred vehicle cannot be ordered with the desired amenities, leading to a disconnect between consumer expectation and product availability. This situation underscores a systemic challenge in GM's supply chain or production planning, impacting customer satisfaction and dealership efficiency.
The ripple effect of General Motors' complex ordering system is profoundly felt by both customers and the dealerships striving to serve them. The disappointment of customers who endure lengthy waits, only to find their desired vehicle configurations are unavailable or significantly delayed, is a common refrain. This often leads to feelings of exasperation and distrust towards the brand, compelling some to abandon their orders or switch to competitors who offer more transparent and efficient purchasing processes. Dealerships, caught between manufacturer limitations and customer expectations, face the unenviable task of managing these frustrations, which can strain their relationships with loyal clients.
Compounding these issues are anecdotal accounts from customers and former dealership employees that highlight the erratic nature of GM's vehicle allocation and production. Stories abound of consumers waiting upwards of a year or more for a specific model, only to discover their order was held up due to the unavailability of certain parts or a peculiar production queue. This unpredictable environment creates significant operational challenges for dealerships, as they struggle to forecast inventory, manage customer relations, and maintain sales targets. The lack of a consistent and reliable ordering process not only diminishes customer satisfaction but also places a substantial burden on the dealerships, who are at the forefront of these interactions.