





Pregnancy often brings a blend of hope and quiet anxiety for families, particularly when the discussion shifts to the heartbreak of loss. Stillbirth remains a deeply personal tragedy within maternal health. However, recent scientific endeavors are providing clearer insights for both expectant parents and medical professionals into how these losses might be averted, underscoring the potential of increased awareness to preserve lives.
The latest extensive study, conducted by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Mass General Brigham and published in October 2025 in JAMA, marks a pivotal moment. This research, one of the most comprehensive analyses of stillbirth to date, examined 2.8 million births and concluded that nearly fifty percent of stillbirths occurring after 37 weeks of gestation could potentially be prevented. This revelation significantly alters the perception of stillbirth prevalence and illustrates how enhanced understanding, accessible care, and robust support systems can help more infants reach their parents safely.
The Harvard-Mass General Brigham investigation identified that approximately 1 in every 147 births in the United States results in stillbirth, a figure higher than the previous CDC estimation of 1 in 175. This indicates that stillbirth is more prevalent than many conditions that garner greater public attention, including maternal mortality. While most pregnancies conclude with healthy births, the study underscores that stillbirth occurs more frequently than commonly believed. In about 70% of identified cases, at least one known risk factor, such as hypertension, diabetes, or declining placental function, was present. These are conditions that, if identified early, can often be effectively managed.
A notable finding was that nearly 28% of stillbirths lacked an identifiable cause, a percentage that rose to about 40% for pregnancies extending beyond 40 weeks. These unexplained cases have initiated new discussions regarding the efficacy of prenatal monitoring, late-term diagnostic testing, and optimal delivery timing in mitigating risks.
The data also substantiated long-standing concerns from advocates: not all families experience the same risk. The stillbirth rate was found to be 1 in 112 in lower-income communities and an alarming 1 in 95 in areas with a higher proportion of Black families. These disparities reflect broader inequalities within U.S. maternal health outcomes, pointing to systemic issues in access to care, resources, and research funding that require immediate attention.
For individuals expecting a child, these research findings can evoke both gravity and empowerment. It is important to remember that the vast majority of pregnancies lead to healthy births. However, being informed about these statistics and attuned to one's own body serves as a crucial protective measure. Expectant parents should engage in open discussions with their healthcare providers regarding risk factors, actively monitor fetal movements and report any changes, and inquire about monitoring options after 40 weeks, such as nonstress tests or biophysical profiles. Maintaining perspective is key; awareness is about fostering collaboration and informed decision-making, not about inducing unnecessary anxiety.
Stillbirth research in the U.S. has historically suffered from insufficient funding and study. Compared to other infant loss categories, stillbirth receives significantly less public investment and recognition. This lack of visibility often leaves grieving families without answers due to a scarcity of available data.
These new findings highlight both existing progress and future opportunities. They unequivocally demonstrate that awareness, coupled with equitable access to care, saves lives. Families in rural or underserved regions frequently encounter obstacles to consistent prenatal appointments or advanced monitoring. Factors such as insurance coverage, transportation, and systemic biases can all impact who receives timely testing and follow-up care. International models, such as those in the United Kingdom and Australia, offer encouraging precedents, where national initiatives have successfully lowered stillbirth rates through public education and comprehensive prevention strategies.
Significant change often originates from collective advocacy efforts. Stillbirth prevention warrants the same level of attention and funding as other critical maternal and infant health concerns. The Stillbirth Health Improvement and Education (SHINE) for Autumn Act, named in memory of Autumn Joy, a baby stillborn in 2011, is a key legislative initiative aimed at enhancing data collection, research, and public education on stillbirth prevention. This bipartisan bill awaits congressional action. Families and their supporters are encouraged to contact their representatives to express support. Advocacy not only influences policy but also helps dismantle the pervasive silence surrounding pregnancy loss, fostering greater understanding and reducing stigma.
No statistical measure can fully convey the profound impact of losing a baby. The grief following a stillbirth is often intensified by feelings of isolation. Many parents report that their greatest need was simply someone willing to listen and acknowledge their child's existence. For individuals who have experienced stillbirth, it is crucial to know that they are not alone and that compassionate support is readily available through various organizations. These resources underscore that help, healing, and strength in seeking support are always within reach.
While the pain of loss remains tender, enhanced awareness, open dialogue, and sustained advocacy can transform this pain into meaningful purpose. The recent stillbirth research provides families and clinicians with improved data, refined questions, and renewed hope. By engaging with and discussing stillbirth, by asking difficult questions, and by supporting those who have endured this experience, society can cultivate an environment where no one navigates this journey in solitude.